The Great Disconnect: Employment vs. GDP
Last Monday morning, Fed chairman Bernanke gave a speech titled, “Recent Developments in the Labor Market.” It was an early morning speech (before the market opened). Here’s the link. Market commentators attributed the market’s 160 point Monday rally to Bernanke’s comments. There was one main takeaway…monetary policy would stay accommodative.
Personally, I think it would be more exciting to see the market rally because of earnings or strong fundamental news. It’s less exciting to think that the market is rallying because money is cheap and will stay cheap.
Regardless, I think that Bernanke’s comments were much more interesting than simply “viva la low rates.” In today’s blog, I want to describe the most interesting things he said. If you want more details (and who wouldn’t?), here’s a pdf of an outline that I wrote about the speech. It will take just a few minutes to read and the back of the pdf file includes all of Chairman Bernanke’s slides.
Now, the short version of Bernanke’s key points…
1. There’s no question that there’s some good news in the labor market. Payrolls have increased almost 250K / month for the past three months, there’s been a significant increase in aggregate hours worked, the unemployment rate has dropped, household expectations have improved, business hiring plans have improved, new claims for unemployment insurance have decreased and measures of breadth of hiring across industry have improved.
2. There are still many negative signs in the labor market. Private payrolls are still five million jobs below peak (plus the population has grown). The unemployment rate is well above a sustainable level (and 3% above the 20 year average). Total hours worked are below pre-crisis level. Long-term unemployment is very high. We’ve seen more of a decline in layoffs than an increase in hiring.
3. Okun’s law suggests that we need to have GDP growth 2% higher than our potential growth (for one year) in order to lower unemployment by 1%. As a result, it seems like the positive employment numbers are not in sync with the pace of expansion.
4. While the decrease in the participation rate has had an impact, we have seen a drop in the unemployment rate of marginally attached workers to the same extent as the overall unemployment rate. This indicates that the “weak” are getting jobs at the same rate as the overall population. This story contradicts the idea of the weak simply dropping out.
5. The increase in employment reflects a catch-up from outsized job losses during recession. Employers feared that the economy was going to be even worse than it turned out to be. In addition, they may have feared a credit crunch, so they tried to conserve cash. Employers are simply getting back to normal staffing.
6. To the extent that we’re just recovering from “over-firing”, we need high growth to lower the unemployment rate further.
7. The high percentage of people who have been unemployed for longer than six months reduces our productive capacity over the long-term. We have a loss of skills. It could also slow our rate of recovery in the short-term because it takes longer to match these people to jobs.
8. It takes older workers longer to find new jobs. This is a structural unemployment problem that has been raising our unemployment rate because a larger percentage of our labor force is older (the aging baby boomers).
9. Since we need higher growth to regain jobs, this can be supported by continued accommodative policy. In addition, if our unemployment is generally cyclical (rather than structural), this also speaks to continued accommodative policy.
10. Even if the unemployment problem is mostly cyclical, if it continues on for too long, it can become structural. Skills can atrophy.
Have a great week.
If you enjoy this blog, please forward it to others who may be interested.
If you want to receive these emails, here’s how:
1. click on this link (or type www.leedsonfinance.com into your browser)
2. toward the top right corner is a place to click on for email service — click and enter your email address
3. you will receive an email which will require you to click on a link to confirm that you want to be on the list
IMPORTANT: if you don’t receive the email in step 3 or you don’t click on the link, you won’t be on the list. Sometimes, people who use corporate emails get blocked (it’s probably 50% of the time). So if you don’t get the email, you know you need to use a personal email.